The Hellenic-affiliated Kingdom of Xiutu and the
Aristocracy of the Xianbei
D. N. Konidaris, konidaris@ieee.org, ch. 5.2.3 of the book CHINESE
CIVILISATION AND ITS AEGEAN AFFINITIES
Abstract
This study examines the enigmatic
Kingdom of Xiutu in the Gansu Corridor and explores its possible Hellenistic
affiliations, focusing on the reign of King Xiutu and his legacy within early
Han China and the Xianbei aristocracy. Drawing on Chinese historical sources,
archaeological evidence, and recent scholarship, it reassesses the traditional
identification of Xiutu as a Xiongnu ruler and advances the argument that the
kingdom may instead represent a Greco-Bactrian or Greco-Saka polity established
in northwestern China during the late second century BCE. Particular attention
is given to the famous golden statue captured by General Huo Qubing, whose
iconography and later depictions suggest Hellenistic religious and artistic
influences. The study further analyzes the hypothesis that the name Xiutu
corresponds to the Hellenistic royal title Soter, and traces the transmission
of this legacy through Jin Midi and the influential Ban family, whose members
played a central role in Han historiography, politics, and intellectual life.
Finally, the article considers the possible genealogical and cultural
connections between Xiutu and segments of the Xianbei military aristocracy, as
well as the broader implications for understanding Sino-Western cultural
exchange, the diffusion of Hellenistic art forms, and the early transmission of
religious and philosophical ideas along the Silk Road.
According to the
historical Book of Han (Han Shu), the kings of the Xiutu and Hunye
kingdoms, who led "barbarian" Hu tribes and acted as allies of the
Xiongnu,5_61 controlled territories along the Gansu Corridor, thus
hindering communication through this part of the Silk Road.5_62
However, in 121 BCE, Emperor Wudi (漢武帝, 157–87 BCE) of the
Han dynasty sent General Huo Qubing, who subjugated the two kingdoms and opened
the vital commercial route. Consequently, the defeated kings, at the head of
tens of thousands of their followers and fearing the wrath of the Xiongnu leader,
were forced to surrender to the Han,5_63 leading to the
establishment of five vassal states under Han authority.5_64 The
victory of the Chinese general was resounding—eight thousand Hu were captured,
and as spoils of war was taken the famous golden statue that Xiutu used in
worship of Heaven.5_65
It is worth
noting, incidentally, that the tomb of general Huo Qubing is adorned with a
stone statue of a horse trampling a Xiongnu warrior—a sculptural innovation
considered a Western influence in China. The famed golden statue of Xiutu is
depicted in an 8th-century mural at the Mogao Caves, where Emperor Wu is also
shown worshipping two Buddhist statues.
Fig. 3_12: Monumental
sculpture from the mausoleum of Huo Qubing with evident Hellenistic aura
In the second part
of his study “Dionysian Rituals and the Golden Zeus of China,” Christopoulos
examines the celebrated golden statue of King Xiutu from Gansu,5_67
aiming to determine its true historical context.5_68 The discovery
of the depiction of Xiutu’s statue in a Dunhuang Mogao Cave mural sheds light
on this question—it reveals the unsuspected presence, during the time of
Emperor Han Wudi, of Greco-Bactrians and their allies, the Saka and Sogdians,
in Gansu. Connecting these events with the twelve gold-and-ivory statues that
Emperor Qin Shi Huangdi had seized about a century earlier in the same region,
we find that a Greco-Saka (or Greco-Bactrian) kingdom—composed of fortified
cities—had its seat in central Gansu and was the first kingdom founded by
Euthydemus I of Bactria. The implications of this discovery extend further, as
it also suggests an alliance between the aforementioned first Emperor of Qin
and the Greco-Saka kingdom of Gansu.
In
his analysis, Christopoulos argues that the name Xiutu may be the Chinese
equivalent of the Hellenistic royal title Soter (Σωτήρ),5_69 and he
emphasizes the likelihood that this king was not ethnically Xiongnu.5_70
Jin Midi, the son of Xiutu, similarly ended up in Han China, but through his
loyalty and service, he became one of Emperor Wu’s closest aides and was
posthumously honored with the title Marquis of Reverence (Jinghou).5_71 His
devotion to duty and respectful demeanor were fully recognized by Emperor Wu,
who appointed him as a regent to rule on behalf of his son, Liu Fuling,5_71a1
as recorded by the renowned historian Ban Gu, who may have belonged to the same
Xiutu lineage. This prominent figure appears in the mural paintings of the
Eastern Han tomb in Helinge’er in modern-day Inner Mongolia,5_71a2 as well as in the Wu Liang Shrine in
Shandong, 5_71a3 within a context that also
reflects multiple Greek influences. Indeed, Jeremy Tanner has examined the
artistic representations of historical events in both the Stoa Poikile (Στοά
Ποικίλη) in Athens and the Wu Liang Shrine in present-day Shandong Province,
identifying notable parallels in their visual storytelling, 5_71a4 alongside other compelling similarities.5_71a5
Ιστορία του Jin
Midi, ιερό του Wu Liang 5_71a6
Η καταγωγή των συγγραφέων του Han-shu
από
τους Xiongnu5_71a7
Jin Midi, along
with his younger brother Lun, founded a political faction that maintained an
influential role for generations.5_72 Prominent members of the Jin
and Ban families later produced major political figures as well as notable
artists and historians.5_73
An interesting theory that could
explain certain Hellenistic customs and artistic associations noted among the
Murong Xianbei comes from the work of Yao Weiyuan (姚薇元, 1905–1985),5_74
who argued that King Xiutu was an ancestor of some members of the Xianbei
military aristocracy. Sanping Chen likewise notes that Chen Yuan, an expert on
the origins of Lu Fayan (author of the monumental rhyming dictionary Qieyun),5_75
found this “barbarian” Xianbei lineage of Lu Fayan quite surprising.
Related to the
aforementioned Hellenistic artistic associations of the Xianbei is a golden
belt kept in the Qinghai Museum. The museum dates the belt to the Tang dynasty,
but Christopoulos observes that:5_76
“There is also a silver-gilt
Hellenistic belt with Greek mythological figures, originally inlaid with
gemstones, found in Qinghai Dulan (都蘭) and said to be from the Kushano-Sassanian period
(Figure 30). Displayed at the Qinghai Museum, the depiction of the divinities
as the prophetic Thriae (Θριαί) bee-nymphs and Dionysos makes it perhaps
earlier than the third century AD, and a Thriae wearing a Greco-Bactrian helmet
demonstrates clearly its origins. Why
would the Sassanians, in that
representation, have used the helmet of a Greco-Bactrian king instead of a
helmet closer in style to their own cultural references? Dulan is in the area
where the Murong Xianbei ruled; it is also possible that the belt was made
right there, in the Greco-Saka kingdom of Gansu, not in Bactria.”
He further adds in the footnote to
Image 30:
Figure 30. (a) Hellenistic
silver-gilt belt of 90 cm, Qinghai Museum. Two figures of Dionysos seem to be
guarding a door, with the thyrsos in the middle. (b) Two winged half-bee Thriae
nymphs hold a wreath (c, d). One of the two is clearly wearing a GrecoBactrian
helmet (c). The king and queen are seated and holding a wreath, symbol of
wealth, power, glory, and eternity. They seem to hold on their knees the same
belt with round sections (e). All the figures have one hand on the stomach and
the other holding a wreath (c, d).
Fig. 5_5: Gilded Silver Belt
with Greek Gods in Emblems
Fig. 5_6: Emblem with a nymph
from the belt (left) & Gold plaques with engraving of winged bee-women,
probably of the Thriae (right)
Summary on Xiutu:
This enigmatic and significant
historical figure in Chinese history was likely of Greek origin. He had a son
named Midi (Rindi), who would later be called “Golden Midi” by Emperor Wudi of
the Han dynasty (157–87 BCE). According to the Hanshu—the official dynastic
history of the early Han—the king Xiutu had his capital in what later became
one of the Han’s “Ten Prefectures of Wuwei” and is described by most historians
as a Xiongnu king.5_77
Jin Midi was born
in 134 BCE into a royal family allied with the Xiongnu and was probably of
Greco-Bactrian descent, ruling the central Gansu region. He was the heir of
King Xiutu (Soter/Σωτήρ), one of the most important kings serving under Gunchen
Chanyu, supreme leader of the Xiongnu. After Gunchen’s death in 126 BCE, his brother
Yizhixie succeeded him. During this time, King Xiutu and another great ruler,
King Hunxie, defended the southwestern borders of the Xiongnu against the Han
dynasty—in what is now central and western Gansu.
This same person, Jin Midi,
together with Xiutu, became the progenitor of the famous Ban family.5_78
According to
Sinologist Sanping Chen, this family produced not only Ban Biao (3–54 CE), Ban
Gu (32–92 CE), and Ban Zhao (ca. 49–ca. 120 CE)—the father, son, and daughter
trio who authored the first dynastic history of China, Hanshou—but also the
courageous and capable diplomat-general Ban Chao (33–103 CE). Ban Chao,
reportedly with a force of only 36 fellow adventurers, reestablished Han
dominance over Central Asia (then known as the Western Regions) after the
collapse under the tragic usurper Wang Mang (45 BCE–23 CE). His achievements
were later continued by his son Ban Yong, who was born in Central Asia.
The historiography
written by the Ban family had a profound influence on restoring Confucian
thought, which was strongly virtue-oriented and pro-agrarian. If historian
Hill’s interpretation is correct, their compassionate reading of history became
the common intellectual mindset of later generations.
Fig. 5_7: 8th century mural in
the Mogao Caves depicting Emperor Wu (worshipping two Buddhist statues) &
the golden statue of Xiutu
Fig. 5_8: Was the pioneering
astronomer, historian, philosopher, writer and musician Ban Zhao of partial
Greek descent?
The intriguing
theory proposed by Yao Weiyuan — that King Xiutu was of Greek origin and
ancestor of certain members of the Xianbei military aristocracy — helps explain
some of the Hellenistic customs and artistic references found among the Murong
Xianbei.5_79 Members of this “ethnic” group held powerful positions
in Chinese aristocracy for many generations, and by the 4th–5th centuries CE,
they even governed the country.5_80
In this sense, the
Greek contribution to Chinese intellectual history can be understood as having
an additional channel of cultural communication, fostering artistic and
philosophical exchange. Furthermore, the introduction of Buddhism into ancient
China was another significant conduit for the diffusion of Greco-Indian
Gandharan artistic traits, as well as related religious and philosophical
ideas.
The Xiongnu chanyu's
consort (Princess Nangong) and Jin Midi (The Great Han Emperor Wu) in Korean film5_80a
NOTES
5_61. Christopoulos
2022, p. 70. See also Qiang 羌 References in the Book
of Han 汉书 Part 1 & 2 (transl. by Rachel Meakin).
5_62. Meakin (part 1),
n. 74.
5_63. Meakin (part 1),
p. 17; Christopoulos 2022, p. 70. Επί του θέματος αναφέρονται
περισσότερες εκδοχές: Zhongxiao
Wang 2015, p. 113; Byung Ho Lee 2011, p. 143, nn. 26-28; Wontack Hong 2012, p. 233; Miller 2009, p. 114.
5_64. Zhongxiao Wang
2015, p. 113; Miller 2009, p. 114, n. 4; Di Cosmo 2009, p. 204.
5_65. Miller 2009, p.
114, n. 38.
5_66. Duan Qingbo 2023,
fig. 9.
5_67. However, it has
been argued, curiously and vaguely (Whitfield 2012, p. 189, nn. 33-35) that the
term Putu (Podo: 蒲圖) was one of the many terms - ways of translating the
term Buddha in classical Chinese. Although the term Fotuo (Bulta: 佛陀)
was most often used, there were also other terms such as Futu (Budo: 浮屠),
Fotu (Buldo: 佛圖), Putu (Podo 蒲圖) and Xiutu
(Hyudo: 休屠).
Reference to the Gold
Man is also made in: Dubs 1937, n. 19.
5_68. Christopoulos
2022, p. 1.
5_69. Christopoulos
2022, p. 70.
5_70. Xumeng Sun 2020,
p. 61; Lan-Ying Tseng 2008. According to
Christopoulos (Christopoulos 2022, p. 69) The “Records of the Grand Historian,
Collected Annotations” (Shiji Jijie 史記集解), translated by James R. Ware, is, however, very
clear on the likelihood that King Xiutu was not a Xiongnu from Mongolia. Jin
Midi was described as “eight chi two cun tall with a stern appearance.”
5_71. Byung Ho Lee
2011, p. 143, nn. 26-28; Miller 2009, p. 114, n. 39.
5_71a1. Loewe 2000, p.
2959; Pan Yue 2026, p. 521; Ban Gu 1974, p. 157.
5_71a2. Xumeng Sun 2020, p. 61. Όμως η πληροφορία δεν επιβεβαιώνεται
από άλλη πηγή, βλ. Knapp 2005, p. 53.
5_71a3. Kuroda and
Knapp 2010, p. 138; Liu 2008; Wu 1989: The funerary
shrine of the Confucian scholar Wu Liang, created in AD 151, is the most
important surviving pre-Buddhist monument in China. That is to say, it is the
most important single work of visual art from the centuries that set the
patterns of Chinese thought for almost two millennia. The importance of the
shrine lies in the beauty of the stone reliefs on its walls and, especially, in
the remarkably comprehensive iconography of its nearly one hundred scenes. They
constitute, in effect, a coherent symbolic structure of the universe as the Han
Chinese conceived it. This structure consists of three sections: the ceiling
carvings present the Mandate of Heaven; the scenes on the two gables depict the
paradise of the immortals; and the 44 stories related on the walls illustrate
the history of mankind, starting with the creators of human culture and ending
with a portrait of Wu Liang, who designed his own memorial. The author finds
the shrine comparable, in the comprehensiveness and cultural significance of
its iconography, to the cathedral at Chartres or the Sistine Chapel. The many
writings that have discussed the shrine over the centuries constitute a history
of the approaches Eastern and Western scholars have taken to Chinese art. The
first part of this book sets out these contributions and approaches as it
recounts the history of the preservation and reconstruction of the shrine. The
second part analyzes the cosmological significance of the shrine, exploring the
internal relationships between the reliefs, and in the process translating for
the first time into English all the literary inscriptions that accompany the
carvings.
5_71a4. Beecroft 2021,
p. 97.
5_71a5. Wu 1989. While
the Wu Liang Shrine is deeply rooted in Chinese Han culture, scholars have
explored potential "Hellenistic connections" or influences resulting
from early Silk Road interactions.
Artistic Evolution: The
shrine's reliefs represent an "archaic revival" of earlier Western
Han styles, yet scholars have noted that the treatment of figures and
narratives might reflect a distant awareness of foreign artistic traditions.
Narrative Style and
Space: Similarities in pictorial art, such as the use of registers (rows) for
storytelling and the rendering of three-dimensional space, have prompted
comparison to Hellenistic Greek art, which similarly aimed to translate history
into visual narratives.
Technique: While the
technique is distinctly Chinese (low-relief rubbing), the thematic focus on
portraying historical "scenes" in a structured, almost panoramic
manner, has been compared with similar artistic developments in the Greek
world, suggesting a potential (though indirect) cultural exchange.
Motifs: Some argue for
indirect influence through Central Asian intermediaries (such as Sogdians or
Iranian cultures), which could have facilitated the transmission of
Hellenistic-inspired themes—like specialized animal husbandry or specific art
motifs—into China by the Eastern Han.
Artistic Motifs:
Similar to the Guyuan Sarcophagus, tomb art in the region of Helinge’er tomb
sometimes incorporated foreign elements like vine scrolls, mythical creatures,
or foreign artistic techniques. The presence of non-local items in tombs
suggests that Central Asian trade networks were bringing items with
Mediterranean or Near-Eastern motifs into Chinese elite culture. In Summary:
The Helinge’er tomb serves as a crucial piece of evidence for studying the
cultural exchange between Han China and the steppe, showing how, by the 2nd
century CE, Hellenistic-inspired art and motifs had become part of the artistic
repertoire found in North China and the Eurasian steppe.
5_71a6. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Story_of_Jin_Midi.JPG
The story of Jin Midi. Wu Liang Shrine, Jiaxiang, Shandong. 2nd century AD. Ink
rubbings derived from stone-carved reliefs as represented in Feng Yunpeng and
Feng Yunyuan, Jinshi suo (1824 edition).
5_71a7. Sanping Chen
2011, p. 36.
5_72. Sanping Chen 2011, p. 35, n. 5.
5_73. Sanping Chen
2011. Briefly, we mention: Ban Biao, Ban Gu and Ban Zhao, a
trio of father, son and daughter, who co-wrote the historiography Han-shu. The
daughter of the first is Ban Zhao, a mathematician, astronomer, writer and
teacher of aristocrats, etc.
5_74. Christopoulos
2022, pp. 74-75, nn. 100-102. See the book by: Yao Weiyuan 2013.
5_75. Sanping Chen.
2011, p. 36.
5_76. Christopoulos
2022, p. 99, fig. 30.
5_77. Christopoulos
2022.
5_78. Sanping Chen
2011, p. 33. The excerpt is as follows:
Readers of China's
early imperial history cannot help being impressed by the exceptional talents
in the Ban family of the Later Han dynasty, known also as the Eastern Han
(25-220). The family produced not only Ban Biao at (3-54 CE), Ban GuAl (32-92
CE) and Ban Zhao PIS' (ca. 49- ca.120 CE), the father-son-daughter trio that
authored China's first ever dynastic history Han-shu, but also the
extraordinarily daring and capable diplomat-general Ban Chao (33-103), who
singlehandedly (reportedly with a force of only 36 fellow adventurers)
re-established the Han domination in Central Asia (known at the time as the
Western Regions) after the debacle under the tragicomic pretender Wang Mang (45
BC-23 AD). Chao's exploit was further carried on by his Central Asia-born son
Ban Yong. Ban Biao's daughter Ban Zhao, a strong mathematician and astronomer
in completing Han-shu, was a respected tutor of princesses and imperial
consorts and was later reverentially known as Cao Dagu ("Grand Dame
Cao," after her husband's family name). She also happened to be one of the
earliest known female authors in Chinese history, responsible for such classics
like Nüjie (Lessons for Women). According to Hou Han-shu (84.2785)1, she even
played an important political role during the regency of Empress Dowager
Deng.
5_79. Christopoulos
2022, pp. 74-75.
5_80. Sanping Chen
1996.
5_80a. Eng 2011, fig.
10.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
https://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp326_dionysian_rituals_china.pdf
Christopoulos, L. 2022.
"Dionysian Rituals and the Golden Zeus of China," Sino-Platonic
Papers 326, pp. 1-123.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41928567
Sanping Chen. 2011. “Two Notes on the Xiongnu Ancestry
of the Authors of ‘Hon-shu’,” Central Asiatic Journal 55 (1), pp. 33-41.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41931010
Sanping Chen. 1996. “A-Gan revisited — The Tuobas
cultural and political heritage,” Journal of Asian History 30 (1), pp.
46-78.
Meakin, R., ed. Qiang 羌 References in the Book of Han 汉书 Part 1,
<https://www.academia.edu/9180831/Qiang_%E7%BE%8C_References_in_the_Book_of_Han_%E6%B1%89%E4%B9%A6_Part_1>
(22 Nov. 2023).
Meakin, R., ed. “Qiang 羌 References in The Book of Han 汉书, Part 2 (Chapter 79 to Chapter 99),” Qiang History –
Translations, <
https://www.academia.edu/11073162/Qiang_%E7%BE%8C_References_in_the_Book_of_Han_%E6%B1%89%E4%B9%A6_Part_2>
(16 March 2019).
https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/37048
Zhongxiao Wang. 2015. World
Views and Military Policies in the Early Roman and Western Han Empires,
Univ. of Leiden.
https://repository.upenn.edu/entities/publication/d7403e54-4819-44f8-9434-ccc93e630998
Miller, B. K. 2009. "Power
Politics in the Xiongnu Empire" (diss. Univ. of Pennsylvania).
https://backend.production.deepblue-documents.lib.umich.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/1b574fc0-dd65-485c-bbd1-dd5ad7f8638b/content
Byung Ho Lee 2011. "Forging
the Imperial Nation: Imperialism, Nationalism, and Ethnic Boundaries in China’s
Longue Durée" (diss. Univ. of Michigan).
http://www.hongwontack.pe.kr/homepage4/data/48001.pdf
Wontack Hong. 2012. East Asian
History. A Tripolar Approach, Korea.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298895771_Han_Frontiers_Toward_an_Integrated_View
Di Cosmo, N. 2009. "Han
Frontiers: Toward an Integrated View," Journal of the American Oriental
Society 129 (2), pp. 199-214.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-chinese-history/article/sinowestern-cultural-exchange-as-seen-through-the-archaeology-of-the-first-emperors-necropolis/3F6506262A9ED57C9DC3827EEAA6B230
Duan Qingbo. 2023.
"Sino-Western Cultural Exchange as Seen through the Archaeology of the
First Emperor's Necropolis," Journal of Chinese History 中國歷史學刊 7 (1), pp. 21 - 72.
http://www.acmuller.net/kor-bud/collected_works.html
Whitfield, R., ed. 2012. Korean
Buddhist Culture. Accounts of a Pilgrimage, Monuments, and Eminent Monks
(Collected Works of Korean Buddhism 10), Korea.
Dubs, H. H. 1937. The "Golden
Man" of Former Han Times," T'oung Pao (second series) 33 (1),
pp. 1-14.
https://backend.production.deepblue-documents.lib.umich.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/1b574fc0-dd65-485c-bbd1-dd5ad7f8638b/content
Byung Ho Lee 2011. "Forging
the Imperial Nation: Imperialism, Nationalism, and Ethnic Boundaries in China’s
Longue Durée" (diss. Univ. of Michigan).
https://books.google.gr/books/about/%E5%8C%97%E6%9C%9D%E8%83%A1%E5%A7%93%E8%80%83.html?id=jEDCAQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Yao
Weiyuan. 2013. Έρευνα για το Επώνυμο του Χου στις Βόρειες Δυναστείες
(Αναθεωρημένη έκδοση), 北朝胡姓考(修訂本),
Wuhan University Press.
Liu, C. Y., ed. 2008. Rethinking
Recarving: Ideals, Practices, and Problems of the "Wu Family Shrines"
and Han China, Princeton University Press.
https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/a-biographical-dictionary-of-the-qin-former-han-and-xin-periods-221-bcad-24-90-04-10364-3.html
Loewe,
M. 2000. A Biographical
Dictionary of the Qin, Former Han and Xin Periods (221 BC-AD 24), Leiden:
Brill.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305228472_Selfless_Offspring_Filial_Children_and_Social_Order_in_Medieval_China
Knapp, K. N. 2005. Selfless
Offspring. Filial Children and Social Order in Medieval China, Publisher:
University of Hawaii Press.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399297565_Ancient_Greece
Pan Yue. 2026. Comparative
Studies on Chinese and Western Civilizations, Springer.
Lillian Lan-Ying Tseng. 2008. "Mediums
and Messages: The Wu Family Shrines and Cultural Production in Qing
China," in Rethinking Recarving: Ideals, Practices, and Problems of the
"Wu Family Shrines" and Han China, ed. Cary Liu Princeton: The
Princeton University Art Museum, pp. 260-283.
https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/0f570209-afee-4041-913d-afb541d76c2d/content
Xumeng Sun. 2020.
"Identifying the Huns and the Xiongnu (or Not): Multi-Faceted Implications
and Difficulties" (thes. Univ. of Calgary).
https://arthistory.uchicago.edu/faculty/publications/wu-liang-shrine-ideology-early-chinese-pictorial-art
https://archive.org/details/wuliangshrineide0000wuhu/page/50/mode/2up?q=Greek
https://arthistory.uchicago.edu/faculty/publications/wu-liang-shrine-ideology-early-chinese-pictorial-art
Wu, Hung. 1989. The Wu
Liang Shrine: the ideology of early Chinese pictorial art, Stanford
University Press.
https://archive.org/details/courtiercommoner0000bang_f3r3
https://dokumen.pub/courtier-and-commoner-in-ancient-china-selections-from-the-history-of-the-former-han-0231083548-9780231083546.html
Ban Gu. 1974. Courtier and Commoner in Ancient China:
Selections from the History of the Former Han, trans. B. Watson, New York:
Columbia University.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391516467_China-Korea_Culture_Wars_and_National_Myths_TV_Dramas_as_Battleground
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου